BackStage


My Weird Little World: Backstage Part 1
May 11, 2008, 11:34 am
Filed under: dramaturgy | Tags: ,

In my very first post, I describe why I started a blog, because I wanted a backstage to put down my stupid ideas and get others to comment on them. So far, it is questionable if either of these goals have been met. But, it was in this first post that Anomie commented:

I think the whole backstage story is one of those lies the adults tell little kids so they feel there really are magical places in the world.

There is no backstage.

I have promised several times throughout my blog to address this, but haven’t yet. This is first in a series of addressing this. I am going to address this in parts, because I think some of my posts tend to run too long. So, to begin this, I offer you a clip from one of my favorite movies (again, starring Robin Williams… no surprise there from me), Good Will Hunting:

Those are the things I miss the most. The little idiosyncrasies that I only knew about. That’s what made her my wife. Oh, and she had the goods on me too. She knew all my little peccadilloes. People call these things imperfections, but they’re not. Oh, that’s the good stuff. Then we get to choose who we let into our weird little worlds.

I have an old friend from high school who rewrites all of his letters before he sends them out… rewrites them if there is a single mistake. Why? Because he wanted his letters, those representations of himself, to be perfect. When I met one of his friends from college, we teased him about this. He got very upset that I told her about this little peccadillo. I didn’t understand it at the time, but I was letting her in on part of his backstage that I had been privileged to and she had not. From my position, I was sharing how great he was (because these oddnesses I do think are what make us wonderful). From his, I was betraying his trust. Now that I understand this, I feel bad about this when I reflect on it all these years later. In fact, I even emailed him to make sure that it was okay to share this story. Again, showing that there is some type of backstage between him and I in our friendship. I felt the need to communicate with him to clarify what was backstage and what was not.

On a related, side note, I’m wondering if we sometimes “slip up” and give away backstage information on our loved ones to make claims on them to others. “See, look what I know about X.”

In my marriage, this is a problem that Blue and I have sometimes. He likes to tease me with our friends, but in doing so, sometimes he lets slip details about my backstage. Things that I was not wanting to share with those particular people at that time. It reminds me of that Mad About You episode where Jamie and Paul are at a party (evidently there is a similar one for Seinfeld). They have a system worked out to indicate to the other how to move through the interaction. Signs for “Save me, this person is boring” or “It’s time to go!” Blue and I have some of those codes too. Paul violates the backstage when he shares the signals with someone else at the party in order to impress her. Later, Jamie uses the “OMG, Save me, this person is boring” signal while talking to this woman.

I think marriage (and being in a couple in general) is one example where there is a clear “team” and a clear “stage” and “backstage.”

Here’s a great post that has people writing in about their signals. Do you guys have these with your partners?


5 Comments so far
Leave a comment

My husband and I signal with our eyes. It’s very subtle, but if one of us is bored or antsy, we just look at the other person and open our eyes slightly more than is normal, with a hint of raised eyebrow. Or sometimes we just bunch up our mouth to the side.

That sounds weird.

With spouses and those we’re most comfortable with, we certainly let our guard down a bit more. At least, this is the ideal for spouses. I’m just not convinced there’s this essential ’self’ that we can reveal, even if we wanted to. I think we even present a front stage with ourselves. Our peccadillos are merely behavioral quirks. Do they reveal anything about our essences?

Someone talked about that imaginary society we always have in our heads, that follows us wherever we go and is always influencing our behavior, even when there’s no actual audience. We make our own audience in our minds. It was probably Goffman, but if that’s true, it has interesting implications for this supposed ‘backstage’.

Comment by anomie

Man, I wish I could raise one eyebrow. I lack that ability, but feel it would add so much to my facial expression repertoire.

Ahh… well, whether there is a unified self is quite another question. If you remember Goffman, he didn’t really believe in one either. The self was simply what we presented while on stage. Off the top of my head, I don’t know if he argued that we had a stage for ourselves, but that seems to be consistent with what he did argue about dramaturgy.

As for what I feel about having a unified self or not, I honestly don’t know. I mean, I generally am a structural symbolic interactionist. Of course, they follow James’s edict that we have as many selves as we have groups of others with whom we interact. That Ridgeway article (the acceptance of the Cooley/Mead address) also has some interesting ideas about this. Of course, postmodernists have tons to say. I actually still don’t know where I come down on that one. But, if we think of stages in the terms of what Goffman means… that we have a way we want to come to certain audiences, then we definitely have backstages. So, I’m thinking we are two ships missing on this concept.

Comment by pitse1eh

[...] My Weird Little World: Backstage Part 1 [...]

Pingback by A Goffman Review: Backstage Part 2 « BackStage

By the way, I also love that scene. Michael and I can sometimes stare at each other with little or no movement for a few seconds and discern what the other is thinking. I don’t know how we do that. Other times, one or both of us are completely oblivious. It’s a crap shoot.

Comment by kristina b

We can’t do that. But, I do find myself translating for him a lot. Meaning — usually explaining to other women what he means when he’s trying to say something. Who was it that suggested that men and women had cross-cultural communication? Deborah… T…

Comment by pitse1eh




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>