BackStage


INTERACT
May 20, 2009, 7:47 am
Filed under: Questions, symbolic interaction

If you know INTERACT, or you know someone who knows someone who knows how to use INTERACT, I need help. They have changed the interface since the last time I used it, and I am just trying to calculate the deflection for a depressed newlywed (male and female data both). I think I did it right, but I’m not sure. It’s the kind of not sure you can’t be when you plan on sending a paper out to a journal.

When you put in an identity it gives you a score right underneath (I’m assuming that’s the fundamental). When you put in emotion, it gives you the same. Then, underneath, it says “combined.” I’m assuming that’s the transient?

I know how to calculate the deflection if those assumptions are correct (the sum of the squared differences between the two). But that’s making a jump.

So if I have an E P A for “newlywed” at 2.81, 1.77, and 1.97 and a combined (depressed newlywed) of -1.44, 0.17, -0.19 then subtracting E1-E2 (2.81 – (-1.44)), P1-P2 (1.77-0.17), A1-A2 (1.97-(-0.19)), then squaring the three values and summing them, I get a deflection of 25.2881.  (I’m assuming this is male data).

Is this right? Is the “combined” the transient score? HELP!



Symbolic Interaction Sets Humans Apart
May 29, 2008, 1:04 pm
Filed under: symbolic interaction | Tags: ,

I found a link to this NYT article over at Fresh Brainz.

Of course, Tomasello doesn’t talk about it in terms of Meadian SI, but it’s obvious:

Another subtle but crucial difference can be seen in communication. The great apes — chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans — communicate almost exclusively for the purpose of getting others to do what they want. Human infants, in addition, gesture and talk in order to share information with others…

Yay Social Psychology for understanding what makes humans different and uniquely human!!!